Home Blog Page 239

Today in History – 2 December

0
today in history 2 december

1552

Father Francis Xavier (1506-1552), Portuguese Jesuit priest, died. He started his mission by training and employing native clergy in conversion efforts. He spread Christianity to India, Malay Archipelago and Japan.

1662

Francis Xavier was canonized at Goa.

1804

Napoleon Bonaparte is crowned Emperor of France in Paris

1911

King George V and Queen Marry visited Bombay, India. The King annulled the partition of Bengal. Delhi was to be made the new capital and the King announced it on 12th December at Delhi Durbar.

1927

1st Model A Ford sold, for $385

1942

Sri Aurbindo Ashram School was inaugurated.

1965

Border Security Force came into existence.

1976

Fidel Castro becomes President of Cuba, replacing Osvaldo Dorticós Torrado

1982

1st permanent artificial heart successfully implanted (U of Utah) in retired dentist Barney Clark; lived 112 days with Jarvic-7 heart

1987

Following the Bhopal Gas disaster on the night of December 2, 1984, the ICMR initiated a series of interdisciplinary investigations on the health of the people with severe, moderate and mild exposure. A Coordinating Unit, which was later re-designated as the Bhopal Gas Disaster Research Centre was established early in 1985 at the Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, to monitor and coordinate the managerial and technical aspects of the various projects.

1989

V. P. Singh sworn in as the 8th Prime Minister of India

1999

Navjot Singh Sidhu, former Indian opening batsman, announced his decision to retire from international and domestic cricket at a press meet in Chandigarh.

Introduction to Quantum Complexity Theory

0
quantum complexity xeb labs

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. What Is Quantum Complexity Theory?
  3. Classical vs Quantum Models of Computation
  4. Why Quantum Complexity Matters
  5. The Quantum Turing Machine
  6. Quantum Circuits and Uniform Families
  7. Basic Quantum Complexity Classes
  8. BQP: Bounded-Error Quantum Polynomial Time
  9. Relationship of BQP to P and NP
  10. BPP vs BQP
  11. QMA: Quantum Analog of NP
  12. QMA-Complete Problems
  13. QCMA and Other Variants
  14. PostBQP and PP
  15. Quantum Interactive Proofs (QIP)
  16. Quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) vs Classical MA
  17. Quantum PCP Conjecture
  18. Oracle Separations in Quantum Complexity
  19. Hardness of Quantum Problems
  20. Complexity of Simulating Quantum Systems
  21. Quantum Reductions
  22. Black-Box and Query Complexity
  23. Quantum Communication Complexity
  24. Role of Entanglement in Complexity
  25. Conclusion

1. Introduction

Quantum complexity theory is the study of computational complexity within the framework of quantum computation. It extends classical complexity theory by introducing quantum resources such as superposition, entanglement, and interference into the analysis of algorithmic difficulty.


2. What Is Quantum Complexity Theory?

Quantum complexity theory classifies problems based on the computational power of quantum computers. It seeks to answer questions like:

  • What can quantum computers do better than classical ones?
  • What are the fundamental limitations of quantum computing?
  • Are there problems uniquely hard or easy for quantum machines?

3. Classical vs Quantum Models of Computation

In classical models (e.g., Turing machines), computation is deterministic or probabilistic over binary bits. In quantum models:

  • States are vectors in Hilbert space
  • Computation is unitary and reversible
  • Measurement collapses the quantum state

4. Why Quantum Complexity Matters

  • Quantum algorithms (like Shor’s and Grover’s) challenge classical limits
  • Understanding BQP and QMA shapes cryptography, optimization, and physics
  • Quantum complexity reveals the boundary between tractable and intractable quantum problems

5. The Quantum Turing Machine

A theoretical model introduced by David Deutsch:

  • Extends classical Turing machines to use quantum logic
  • Operates on a superposition of states
  • Useful for defining quantum complexity classes

6. Quantum Circuits and Uniform Families

In practice, quantum algorithms are modeled using quantum circuits:

  • Circuits made from unitary gates (H, CNOT, T, etc.)
  • A uniform family of circuits has a classical algorithm that generates the circuit for input size \( n \)

7. Basic Quantum Complexity Classes

  • BQP: Efficient quantum algorithms with bounded error
  • QMA: Quantum analogue of NP (quantum proof, classical verifier)
  • QIP: Interactive quantum protocols
  • PostBQP: Quantum with postselection (equal to PP)

8. BQP: Bounded-Error Quantum Polynomial Time

Problems solvable by a quantum computer in polynomial time, with error probability ≤ 1/3:

\[
\text{BQP} = \{L \mid \text{quantum algorithm decides } L \text{ with high probability in poly time} \}
\]

Examples:

  • Shor’s factoring algorithm
  • Discrete log
  • Simulating quantum systems

9. Relationship of BQP to P and NP

It is known:

\[
P \subseteq BPP \subseteq BQP \subseteq PSPACE
\]

Whether \( BQP \subseteq NP \) or \( NP \subseteq BQP \) is unknown.


10. BPP vs BQP

  • BPP: Probabilistic classical algorithms
  • BQP: Quantum algorithms with unitary evolution and measurement
  • BQP can solve some problems (like factoring) exponentially faster than any known BPP algorithm

11. QMA: Quantum Analog of NP

A language is in QMA if:

  • There exists a polynomial-time quantum verifier
  • Given a quantum proof (witness), it accepts with high probability if input is in the language

\[
\text{QMA} \supseteq NP
\]


12. QMA-Complete Problems

Hardest problems in QMA:

  • Local Hamiltonian Problem: Quantum analogue of SAT
  • Quantum separability testing
  • Ground state energy estimation

13. QCMA and Other Variants

  • QCMA: Quantum verifier, classical witness
  • QAM: Quantum Arthur-Merlin protocols
  • QIP: Interactive proofs using quantum communication

14. PostBQP and PP

  • PostBQP = PP: Problems solvable with postselection
  • Highlights how powerful postselection can be
  • Suggests that minor changes to quantum models can drastically increase power

15. Quantum Interactive Proofs (QIP)

  • Involve interaction between a prover and a verifier
  • Quantum generalization of IP
  • Surprisingly: \( QIP = PSPACE \)

16. Quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) vs Classical MA

Classical MA: Merlin (proof) sends message to Arthur (verifier)

QMA:

  • Merlin sends a quantum state
  • Arthur verifies using a quantum computation

17. Quantum PCP Conjecture

Quantum version of the PCP theorem:

  • Would imply hardness of approximation for quantum problems
  • Still unresolved

18. Oracle Separations in Quantum Complexity

Oracle constructions have shown:

  • \( BQP \not\subseteq PH \) (with oracle)
  • \( NP \not\subseteq BQP \) (with oracle)
  • These give evidence for separations between classes

19. Hardness of Quantum Problems

  • Quantum analogues of classical hard problems
  • Quantum state discrimination, separability, entanglement detection
  • Often QMA-complete

20. Complexity of Simulating Quantum Systems

  • Simulating local Hamiltonians is QMA-complete
  • Simulating many-body systems is classically hard
  • Quantum algorithms offer exponential speedup for some simulation tasks

21. Quantum Reductions

Reductions between quantum problems:

  • QMA-hardness proofs use quantum reductions
  • Error amplification and tensorization are common techniques

22. Black-Box and Query Complexity

Measures number of oracle queries to solve a problem:

  • Grover’s algorithm: quadratic speedup
  • Quantum lower bounds proven using adversary methods

23. Quantum Communication Complexity

Study of quantum communication protocols:

  • Quantum protocols can exponentially reduce communication
  • Entanglement-assisted communication is particularly powerful

24. Role of Entanglement in Complexity

  • Entanglement is essential for QMA
  • Verifiers can’t clone quantum proofs
  • Entangled proofs can increase verification complexity

25. Conclusion

Quantum complexity theory extends classical ideas into the quantum realm, offering a richer landscape of computational possibilities and limitations. It reveals where quantum machines surpass classical ones, how quantum proofs differ from classical certificates, and which problems remain hard even for quantum devices. As quantum hardware evolves, quantum complexity theory will remain essential to understanding its potential.


.

Today in History – 1 December

0
today in history 1 december

1964

Battle of Anvadi.

1885

Dattatreya Balkrishna Kalelkar, famous Gandhian Gujrathi litterateur, and educationist was born at Satara in Maharashtra.

1886

Raja Mahendra Pratap, great revolutionary freedom fighter, and social reformer was born at Musran in U.P.

1921

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, great nationalist leader, social reformer and freedom fighter was arrested by the British police for six months and sent to jail.

1928

The first talkie film show, named as ‘British Talkies’, was released on December 1, 1928, at Globe Theatres, Calcutta.

1931

The Second Round Table conference that began in London ended. Congress was solely represented by Gandhi and Muslim League by Sir Allama Iqbal and Quaid-e-Azam, etc. Two committees were setup to carry out the work of the conference on Federal Structure and Minorities. Gandhi was the member of both committees. He claimed that being the sole representative of the Congress, he represented the whole of India. Quaid-e-Azam replied that Muslims are a separate nation. Sir Shafi demanded that the 14 points of Quaid-e-Azam be incorporated in the future constitution.

1946

Australia compiled 645 vs India at Gabba. Bradman made 187 runs.

1951

Abanindra Nath Tagore, the famous Indian painter, and sculptor died in Calcutta.

1955

Nikita Khrushchev delivers the speech condemning British colonialism.

1964

Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University established.

1982

Pakistan beats India to win hockey gold in the Asian Games.

Classical Complexity Classes (P, NP, PSPACE)

0
quantum complexity xeb labs

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. What Are Complexity Classes?
  3. Deterministic vs Non-Deterministic Models
  4. Class P (Polynomial Time)
  5. Class NP (Nondeterministic Polynomial Time)
  6. Relationship Between P and NP
  7. NP-Complete Problems
  8. Reductions and Hardness
  9. Class PSPACE (Polynomial Space)
  10. Relationships Among P, NP, and PSPACE
  11. The Time and Space Hierarchy
  12. Examples of Problems in Each Class
  13. Practical Implications
  14. Open Questions in Classical Complexity
  15. Conclusion

1. Introduction

Complexity theory seeks to understand how much computational effort is needed to solve different problems. Classical complexity classes like P, NP, and PSPACE provide a framework for this analysis by categorizing problems according to the time and space resources required.


2. What Are Complexity Classes?

Complexity classes are sets of decision problems that can be solved by a machine (Turing machine) under specified constraints:

  • Time: Number of steps to compute
  • Space: Memory used during computation

3. Deterministic vs Non-Deterministic Models

  • Deterministic Turing Machine (DTM): Executes a single computational path
  • Non-Deterministic Turing Machine (NTM): Can explore multiple paths in parallel
  • Many complexity classes are defined with respect to these models

4. Class P (Polynomial Time)

P is the set of decision problems that can be solved in polynomial time on a deterministic Turing machine.

\[
P = \{ L \mid \text{There exists a DTM that decides } L \text{ in } O(n^k) \text{ for some } k \}
\]

Examples:

  • Sorting
  • Finding the greatest common divisor
  • Matrix multiplication
  • Graph reachability

5. Class NP (Nondeterministic Polynomial Time)

NP is the set of problems for which a solution can be verified in polynomial time by a deterministic machine.

Equivalently:

  • Solvable in polynomial time on a non-deterministic machine
  • Or: Verifiable in polynomial time if a solution is guessed

Examples:

  • Boolean satisfiability (SAT)
  • Hamiltonian cycle
  • Subset sum

6. Relationship Between P and NP

\[
P \subseteq NP
\]

  • Every problem in P is trivially in NP
  • The open question: Is \( P = NP \)?
  • If true, many problems believed to be hard would be easy to solve

7. NP-Complete Problems

NP-complete problems are the hardest in NP:

  1. They are in NP
  2. Every NP problem can be polynomial-time reduced to them

Examples:

  • SAT
  • 3SAT
  • Traveling Salesman Problem (decision version)
  • Clique

If any NP-complete problem is in P, then P = NP


8. Reductions and Hardness

  • Reduction: One problem transforms into another
  • If \( A \leq_p B \) and \( B \in P \), then \( A \in P \)
  • Used to prove problem difficulty and completeness

9. Class PSPACE (Polynomial Space)

PSPACE is the class of problems solvable in polynomial space on a deterministic machine, regardless of time.

\[
PSPACE = \{ L \mid \text{There exists a DTM that decides } L \text{ using } O(n^k) \text{ space} \}
\]

Includes all problems solvable with polynomial memory:

  • May require exponential time
  • Subsumes both P and NP

10. Relationships Among P, NP, and PSPACE

The following inclusions hold:

\[
P \subseteq NP \subseteq PSPACE
\]

Whether any of these inclusions are strict is still unknown, but most complexity theorists believe:

\[
P \ne NP \ne PSPACE
\]


11. The Time and Space Hierarchy

The hierarchy theorems show:

  • More time → strictly more power
  • More space → strictly more power

\[
\text{TIME}(n) \subsetneq \text{TIME}(n^2), \quad \text{SPACE}(n) \subsetneq \text{SPACE}(n^2)
\]


12. Examples of Problems in Each Class

ProblemClass
Sorting integersP
SATNP-complete
Generalized chessPSPACE-complete
Regular expression matchingP
TQBF (True Quantified Boolean Formula)PSPACE-complete

13. Practical Implications

  • P problems: Efficient and scalable
  • NP problems: Often solved heuristically or with approximation
  • PSPACE problems: Rarely tractable, used in logic, verification, and AI

14. Open Questions in Classical Complexity

  • Is \( P = NP \)?
  • Is \( NP = PSPACE \)?
  • Are there problems in \( NP \setminus P \)?
  • Do faster algorithms exist for known hard problems?

15. Conclusion

Classical complexity classes like P, NP, and PSPACE help us categorize problems based on their inherent difficulty and feasibility. Understanding these classes is crucial for algorithm design, cryptography, optimization, and the theoretical foundations of computer science.


.

Introduction to Computational Complexity

0
quantum complexity xeb labs

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. What Is Computational Complexity?
  3. Importance in Computer Science and Physics
  4. Time and Space Complexity
  5. Big O Notation
  6. Worst, Average, and Best-Case Complexity
  7. Complexity Classes Overview
  8. P: Polynomial Time
  9. NP: Nondeterministic Polynomial Time
  10. NP-Complete Problems
  11. NP-Hard Problems
  12. co-NP and Beyond
  13. PSPACE and EXPTIME
  14. Reductions and Completeness
  15. Hierarchy Theorems
  16. Oracle Machines and Relativization
  17. Randomized Complexity Classes: BPP, RP, ZPP
  18. Counting Classes: #P
  19. Quantum Complexity Classes: BQP
  20. Interactive Proofs: IP and PCP
  21. Time-Space Trade-offs
  22. Practical Applications of Complexity Theory
  23. Cryptography and Complexity
  24. Limitations of Algorithms
  25. Open Problems and the P vs NP Question
  26. Conclusion

1. Introduction

Computational complexity theory is a foundational area of theoretical computer science that studies the intrinsic difficulty of computational problems. It categorizes problems based on the resources needed—typically time and space—to solve them.


2. What Is Computational Complexity?

It answers questions like:

  • How fast can a problem be solved?
  • Can we do better than brute-force?
  • Are there problems we can never solve efficiently?

The goal is to classify problems and relate them to each other in terms of computational difficulty.


3. Importance in Computer Science and Physics

  • Guides algorithm design
  • Underpins cryptographic security
  • Informs limits of quantum and classical computers
  • Shapes understanding of what is feasible to compute

4. Time and Space Complexity

  • Time Complexity: Number of steps an algorithm takes
  • Space Complexity: Amount of memory used

Both are expressed in terms of the input size \( n \).


5. Big O Notation

Describes asymptotic behavior:

\[
O(f(n)) = \text{At most proportional to } f(n)
\]

Examples:

  • \( O(1) \): Constant time
  • \( O(n) \): Linear
  • \( O(n^2) \): Quadratic
  • \( O(2^n) \): Exponential

6. Worst, Average, and Best-Case Complexity

  • Worst-case: Max time for any input
  • Average-case: Expected time over distribution of inputs
  • Best-case: Fastest time (often not meaningful alone)

7. Complexity Classes Overview

Groups problems with similar resource requirements:

  • P, NP, PSPACE, EXP, etc.
  • Defined with respect to Turing machines

8. P: Polynomial Time

Problems solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in polynomial time.

\[
\text{Example: Sorting, matrix multiplication, primality testing}
\]


9. NP: Nondeterministic Polynomial Time

Problems verifiable (not necessarily solvable) in polynomial time.

\[
\text{Example: SAT, subset sum, Hamiltonian cycle}
\]


10. NP-Complete Problems

Hardest problems in NP:

  • Any NP problem can be reduced to them
  • If any NP-complete problem is in P, then P = NP

11. NP-Hard Problems

At least as hard as NP-complete problems:

  • May not be in NP (e.g., Halting Problem)
  • Not necessarily decision problems

12. co-NP and Beyond

  • co-NP: Complement of NP
  • Related to proving that answers are no, not yes
  • Open question: Is NP = co-NP?

13. PSPACE and EXPTIME

  • PSPACE: Polynomial space problems
  • EXPTIME: Problems solvable in exponential time

Hierarchy:

\[
\text{P} \subseteq \text{NP} \subseteq \text{PSPACE} \subseteq \text{EXPTIME}
\]


14. Reductions and Completeness

Reduction: Transform one problem into another in polynomial time
Used to prove hardness and completeness


15. Hierarchy Theorems

  • Show that more resources yield more power
  • Time hierarchy: \( \text{TIME}(n) \subsetneq \text{TIME}(n^2) \)
  • Space hierarchy: \( \text{SPACE}(n) \subsetneq \text{SPACE}(n \log n) \)

16. Oracle Machines and Relativization

Oracle machines have access to an external problem solver:

  • Used to study theoretical limits
  • Some oracles show \( P = NP \), others \( P \ne NP \)

17. Randomized Complexity Classes: BPP, RP, ZPP

  • BPP: Bounded-error probabilistic polynomial time
  • RP: Randomized polynomial time (no false positives)
  • ZPP: Zero-error probabilistic polynomial time

18. Counting Classes: #P

Counts the number of solutions, rather than deciding yes/no.

\[
\text{Example: #SAT counts satisfying assignments}
\]


19. Quantum Complexity Classes: BQP

  • BQP: Bounded-error Quantum Polynomial time
  • Problems solvable efficiently by a quantum computer

\[
\text{Example: Shor’s algorithm, Grover’s search}
\]


20. Interactive Proofs: IP and PCP

  • IP: Verifier and prover exchange messages
  • PCP: Verifier checks proof by inspecting few bits
  • Key for hardness of approximation

21. Time-Space Trade-offs

Algorithms may trade time for space, and vice versa:

  • In-place sorting uses less memory but more time
  • Preprocessing saves time but increases memory use

22. Practical Applications of Complexity Theory

  • Compiler optimization
  • Cryptographic security
  • Circuit design
  • Complexity-aware AI systems

23. Cryptography and Complexity

Public key cryptography depends on:

  • Difficulty of factoring (RSA)
  • Discrete logarithm problem (ECDSA)

Quantum threats (e.g., Shor’s algorithm) challenge classical assumptions.


24. Limitations of Algorithms

Some problems are:

  • Undecidable (Halting Problem)
  • Intractable (TSP for large \( n \))
  • Heuristically solvable but not provably fast

25. Open Problems and the P vs NP Question

Most famous open problem:
\[
\text{Is P = NP?}
\]

A “yes” would revolutionize optimization, AI, and cryptography.


26. Conclusion

Computational complexity classifies problems and algorithms based on efficiency. It illuminates what can be solved quickly, what is fundamentally hard, and what might require radically new tools—like quantum computers—to crack. It remains one of the most intellectually rich and practically important areas of computing and mathematics.


.