Home Blog Page 66

Quit India Movement

14

In 1935, a new legislation was introduced which widened the franchise. On this basis, elections were held in 1937. The Congress contested the elections and formed governments in many provinces. These governments tried to implement some of the promises they had made like the release of political prisoners, greater attention to education and health, some relief to the peasantry, etc. they, however, remained in office for a short time.

In 1939, when Second World War broke out, the British government declared without consulting any of the Indian representatives that India was also a party to the War. The congress ministries resigned in protest. From then on, it was only a matter of time and preparation when the next phase of organized struggle would be started.

Read Also: Governor Generals and Viceroys of India

It was on 8th August 1942 that the Congress announced the ‘Quit India’ movement. Gandhi exhorted the people to ‘do or die’. The British government arrested most of the leaders before they could organize the movement. But this did not dampen the spirit of the people. New leaders emerged at local levels who led and sustained the movement.

As this movement lacked a central command and the government repression was at its highest, violence broke out everywhere. Railway stations, post office, and police stations were burned down. Railway lines and telephone and telegraph wires were cut.

In many areas, parallel governments were set up. Strikes and demonstrations were also organized and people attacked and disrupted the government transport system. The government replied with further repression. Thousands were killed and many more arrested. Although the government was able to crush the movement, it was now apparent that people wanted freedom from the foreign rule and they were prepared to use violence to this end.

Must Read:

Skill India Mission (SIM)

Overview of the History of India over a Timeline

Emergence of Gandhi

0
Emergence of Gandhi

The emergence of Gandhi played a pivotal role in the history of Indian Nationalism. The development of Indian Nationalism occurred in three separate phases. It was the third phase of Indian Nationalism that witnessed the rise of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, as the man who took the country by storm with his novel political ideologies centered on the cardinal principles of ahimsa and satyagraha.  Armed with these ideological tools Gandhi shouldered critical responsibilities in the momentous events that finally led India to the path of freedom.

Emergence of Gandhi

  • The Swadeshi Movement declined by 1917. There was also a split in the Congress in 1907 and Tilak was imprisoned and deported in 1908.
  • Aurobindo Ghosh and Bipin Chandra Pal retired from politics and Lala Lajpat Rai left India for some time. All these development led to a decline in the nationalist movement.
  • It remained dormant for a few years but was revived during the First World War. Annie Besant and Tilak started Home Rule Leagues and the two wings of the Congress united in 1916.
  • The War also witnessed the Ghadar Movement started in the United States by some Indian revolutionaries which sought to overthrow the British rule in India.
  • However, the most important development was Emergence of Gandhi ie., the arrival of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who as later popularly known as Mahatma Gandhi, from South Africa.
  • In South Africa, Gandhi  had fought for the rights of the Indians against the racist regime. From 1919 to 1947, when India attained independence, Gandhi remained the foremost leader of the national movement.
  • Gandhi arrived in India on 9th January 1915. Initially, he spent a year visiting various places in India to have an understanding of the situation.
  • His political engagement started in the 1917-18 period when he took up the issues of Champaran indigo farmers, the Ahmedabad textile workers, and the Kheda peasants.
  • These struggles witnessed his specific method of agitation, known as Satyagraha, which had earlier developed in the South African context and through which he was partially successful in achieving his goal.
  • In Champaran, which was in North Bihar, the indigo planters were forcing the peasants to grow indigo even when it was not profitable for the peasants to do so. In fact, the peasants were suffering losses by cultivating indigo in their most fertile lands.
  • Gandhi was invited by the peasants to lead their struggle against the indigo planters who enjoyed the support of the colonial state. Gandhi went there to lead the struggle of the peasants and was successful to get them relief.
  • In Kheda district of Gujarat, most of the crops were damaged due to excessive rain. The peasants of Kheda demanded from the government that they should be allowed not to pay the revenue for that particular year.
  • The government, however, refused. Gandhi started a Satyagraha movement on 22 March 1918 and advised the peasants not to pay revenue. Many peasants participated in the movement but the government refused to budge.
  • It was a test for the new method of agitation which emergence of Gandhi was trying in India. The agitation continued for some time. But Gandhi realised that it was not possible for the peasants to continue for long. Meanwhile, the government granted some concession to the poorer peasants. The movement was then withdrawn.
  • In Ahmedabad, Gandhi led the struggle of the workers for an increase in the wages due to rising prices during the War. After a protracted struggle, the workers were able to get 35% rise in their wages.
  • These struggles demonstrated to the Indian people Gandhi’s method of political struggle and his principles of non-violent non-cooperation. They, on the other hand, helped Gandhi to familiarize himself with the Indian situation and understand the strengths and weaknesses of the Indian people. They also attracted many political workers who were to prove valuable in the future struggles.

Don’t Miss:

Industrial Revolution in England

0
british industrial revolution

When a predominantly agrarian economy based on agriculture and handicrafts is transformed into an economy which is predominantly industrial; Industries and transport is mechanized; The production is carried on in factories, the transformation is called Industrial Revolution. The wage labour and commodity production is a basic characteristic of this mode of production.

Famous historian C. J. H. Hayes does not subscribe to this concept of Industrial Revolution. He writes, “So far-reaching has been the mechanical progress of last hundred and fifty years, and so profound its social consequences, that term ‘Industrial Revolution’ is customarily employed to describe it. A more accurate term would be Industrial Evolution, for ‘Revolution’ is apt to connote a sharp, sudden upheaval with results immediately apparent.” He goes on to argue, “The so-called Industrial revolution was not sudden, nor were its effects speedily appreciated. The process of improving manufacturing techniques, developing factory system and increasing industrial output has been long and evolutionary.”

Must Read: The Chinese Revolution

But, even Hayes concedes that term ‘Industrial Revolution’ can be applied to an industrial transformation of England during the period 1830 to 1870. England was the first country where Industrial Revolution took place.

Why Industrial Revolution took Place in England First?

The Industrial Revolution took place first of all in England for the simple reason that the pre-requisites for such a revolution were present in England and not in any other country. These pre-requisites were capital, labour, techniques, resources, transportation, and markets.

Capital

For a large scale mechanized industrial production a lot of money i.e., the capital was required. It was needed for the purchase of land, machi¬nery, raw materials, transport and payment of wages. By the end of 18th century, England possessed enough wealth to convert it into capital. According to Pro. Hayes much of the industrial capital of England was self¬generated. The manufacturers saved a part of their profits and re-invested it in industries. But, this theory does not present a true picture of the way and method through which capital generated. By the end of 18th century, England had accumulated a lot of wealth through two means. At home, the enclosure movement cleared the ground for capitalist farming. This made agriculture more profitable and capital generating. Secondly, from abroad loot and plunder of colonial people, particularly of India, brought riches and money to enhance the volume of capital. Thus, it was the ruined and devastated peasantry of England and exploited people of colonies who paid for capital generation in England.
England put to best use the capital so generated. It was made possible by the fact that by this time it had developed a most efficient banking system to facilitate smooth financial transactions. The Bank of England played the pivotal i.e., the key role in this system. The Bank was established in 1694 A.D.

Labour

Labour is another pre-requisite of industrialization. The Enclosure Movement and large-scale capitalist farming that followed it ensured that this pre-condition of the industrial revolution is fulfilled. As Michele Beaud writes, “These changes in property and agricultural usage made available a considerable labour force deprived though it often was of the essentials for living. This labour force made possible an increase in mining and manufacturing production.” Hayes mentions the 100% growth rate of population in the 18th century as a contributory factor in the supply of labour force. But he also concedes that “Perhaps most important of all, labour was made available for factory production through the gradual destruction of the old peasant farming as a result of the enclosure movement.” Thus to quote Beaud again, “The personnel in the mill was at the beginning composed of the most disparate elements: peasants chased away from their village expansion of large properties, laid off soldiers indigents in the care of the parish, outcasts of every class and every trade.”

Must Read: Major Revolutions

Techniques

For a rapid mechanization of industries, it is necessary that techniques, process, and machines are invented and improved in a continuous process. In England in the 18th and early part of the 19th century, this process was going on at a very fast pace. Before the end of the 18th century, England had developed Flying Shuttle (John Kay, 1733), the Spinning Jenny (James Hargreaves, 1667), the Water Frame (Richard Arkwright, 1669), the Spinning Mule (Samuel Crompton, 1779) the Power loom (Edmund Cartwright, 1785), the Cylindrical calico-printing machine (Thomas Bell, 1785) and chemical bleaching and chemical dyes. What is of greater significance, “They had been successfully grouped in factories operated by water or even steam power.” As a result of which the factory cotton industry grew by leaps and bounds.

Similarly Darby’s coal blast process invented in mid-18th century, together with John Smeaton’s Air pump (1760), Reverberatory furnace, Puddling and the rolling mill (all three developed by Henry Cort and Peter Onions in 1783), James Watts steam hammer and steel process of Huntsman gave a great push to iron industry in England.Mining, textile and iron industries formed the backbone of industrial revolution in England.

Resources

Resources referred to natural resources necessary for industrial revolution. In the words of Hayes, “England was well endowed with just the resources needed for industrialization. Its climate was damp enough to be highly suitable for mechanical spinning and weaving. Its water power was ample. More important, England was abundantly endowed with iron and coal.”

Transportation

By the end of 18th century, England had developed an efficient and widespread network for transportation. It had a number of very good sea-ports which facilitated maritime trade and voyage. On the land construction of canals and roads was taken up in a big way. This network of roads and canals gave a great boost to trade and industry. Hayes writes, “Since no part of the country is much more than sixty or seventy miles from salt water, these roads and canals soon put many inland towns in a position to share directly in the growing British trade.”

Markets

No industrialized production can sustain itself unless there are markets to absorb its products. Even in this respect England was placed in a favourable position. By the beginning of 19th century England, Scotland, and Ireland formed a vibrant home market for industries of England. Outside this home market, the conquests in India also created a market for manufactured goods of England. Though the United States of America, was no longer a British colony, it still remained a big customer of British goods. Taking advantage of the French Revolution and Napoleonic wars the British traders and merchants had entered the markets of Latin America as well. Their presence was felt in the markets of Europe also. Thus, there was no dearth of markets for industrial products of England.

Role of the State

Thus, according to Hayes England had all the six pre-requisites and that is why industrial revolution first took place there but Hayes overlooks the role played by the state in facilitating the industrial revolution. Explaining this role Michel Beaud writes, “the state played a large role in this, with protectionist measures and the licenses and the monopolies of mercantilist policies, with political and military support for commercial and colonial expansion, with the police against the poor and suppression of the workers’ revolts.”

Don’t Miss: Contributions of Britain to the World

Impact of Industrial Revolution

Industrial revolution or some may say industrial evolution was epoch-making in its impact. It caused a thorough transformation not only of economy but also of society, polity, literature, culture etc.

So far as an economy is concerned, the industrial revolution brought to an end the feudal mode of production based on traditional farming and handicrafts. The old economy was replaced by the new capitalist mode of production. The basic characteristics of the new mode were an introduction of the factory system, more and more use of machinery in production. Even the agricultural production was transformed. The old methods of production were replaced by new capitalist methods. The economic consequences of these changes were far-reaching. Production, trade, and commerce grew by leaps and bounds. This, in turn, led to the creation of enormous wealth. But this wealth was not distributed among the people in an equitable manner. It was concentrated in the hands of few. Therefore, economic inequality registered sharp growth. There were islands of prosperity in the ocean of poverty. Exploitation was intense. Unemployment was on the rise and the masses were condemned to live a miserable life.

The impact of the industrial revolution was on the political system of England as well.
Once a feudal society and economy began to be transformed into the capitalist society and economy, it was but natural that political system should also change accordingly. The feudal state made way to the capitalist bourgeois state. The process of democratization of political institutions was set in motion and was almost completed by the end of 19th century. The monarchy became constitutional; the supremacy of the Parliament was established; the franchise was made broad-based; the authority of the lower house i.e., the House of Commons became an established fact.

The social consequences of an industrial revolution were far-reaching. The old social classes survived but they lost much of their power and social prestige and privilege. The industrial revolution gave birth to new social classes i.e., the industrial bourgeoisie and the factory worker, also known as the proletariat. The agricultural labour class and the growing middle class which was going to play an important role in the future history of England also flourished. The emergence of new social classes gave birth to new social movements and conflicts. The Chartist Movement was the most important of them.

The industrial revolution influenced the trajectory of the growth of Science, technology, culture, literature, philosophy and ideology.

The pace of scientific advance was quickened. New inventions and new technologies rapidly followed each other. Liberalism, Humanitarianism, Utopian Socialism, Romanticism and Utilitarianism became the talks of the day.

Also Read:
Phases of British Rule in India
Inventions that changed the World

The Great Indian Leaders

2
Indian Leaders
Indian Leaders

India is a land of great political leaders who ruled the country effectively and also by protecting its national interest. It was not an easy task to accomplish, keeping in view the changes taking place in the world political scenario. Leaders like Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Lal Bahadur Shastri, and Indira Gandhi Bose played an indispensable role in changing the perspective of the world towards India. The manner, in which issues like border disputes, Kashmir and growing shortage of food grains were handled, they really deserve an honor. They led the country from the front, without being showing any inclination to either of the power blocs. Some of them are:

Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Bal Gangadhar Tilak was a social reformer and freedom fighter. He was one of the prime architects of modern India and strongest advocates of Swaraj (Self-Rule). He was universally recognized as the “Father of Indian Movement”.

Read Also: The Revolt 1857: the First War of Independence

Bhagat Singh
Bhagat Singh was among the prominent revolutionaries who shaped the base of a grand national movement. Following his execution, on March 23, 1931, the supporters and followers of Bhagat Singh regarded him as a “Shaheed”, “martyr”.

Chandrasekhar Azad
A contemporary of Bhagat Singh, Chandrasekhar Azad was a born firebrand revolutionary. He engaged in a heroic battle against the British. His role was crucial in inspiring the others of his generation to participate in the national movement for freedom.

Gopal Krishna Gokhale
Gopal Krishna Gokhale was one of the pioneers of the Indian Independence Movement. Gokhale was a senior leader of the Indian National Congress. He was one of the most learned men in the country, a leader of social and political reformists and one of the earliest and founding leaders of the Indian Independence Movement.

Indira Gandhi
Indira Gandhi was, undoubtedly, one of the greatest political leaders of India. She was the first and only woman to be elected as the Prime Minister. She is also regarded as the most controversial political leader of the country for her unprecedented decision of imposing “a state of emergency”.

Jawaharlal Nehru
Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of independent India. He was a member the Congress Party that led the freedom movement against British Empire. Nehru was one of the architects who had the opportunity to steer the newly freed-nation. He was also the chief framer of domestic and international policies between 1947 and 1964.

Lala Lajpat Rai
Lala Lajpat Rai immensely contributed in attaining independence the nation. He helped in establishing few schools in the country. He also initiated the foundation of Punjab National Bank. In 1897, he founded the Hindu Orphan Relief Movement to keep the Christian missions from securing custody of these children.

Lal Bahadur Shastri
He devoted his life for the pride and honor of the country. Shastri was regarded as a man of principles. Lal Bahadur Shastri offered his resignation as Union Railway Minister; hours after he was made aware of a train accident that killed around 150 people.

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was a renowned journalist of his time. Disturbed by his provocative articles, the British Government decided to deport him off Calcutta. Despite of his house-arrest and imprisonment, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad continued to write against the anti-people policies of the British Government.

Must Read: Rise of the Maratha Nationalism

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was a freedom fighter of India. He was the founder of the Indian National Army. During pre-independence period, Netaji had visited London to discuss the future of India, with the members of the Labor party.

Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Rajendra Prasad was a great leader of the Indian Nationalist Movement and also one of the architects of the Indian Constitution. He was elected as the first President of the Republic of India. Rajendra Prasad was a crucial leader of the Indian Independence Movement, who left his lucrative profession to participate in the nationalist movement of India.

Rajiv Gandhi
Rajiv Gandhi was one of the popular Prime Ministers of India. The developmental projects launched by him include the national education policy and expansion of telecom sector. Besides his achievement and subsequent popularity, Rajiv Gandhi also emerged as one of India’s controversial Prime Ministers.

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Vallabhbhai Patel was one of the great social leaders of India. He played a crucial role during the freedom struggle of India and was instrumental in the integration of over 500 princely states into the Indian Union. Despite the choice of the people, on the request of Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Patel stepped down from the candidacy of Congress president.

Sarojini Naidu
Sarojini Naidu was truly one of the gems of the 20th century India. She was known by the sobriquet “The Nightingale of India”. Her contribution was not confined to the fields of politics only but she was also a renowned poet. The play “Maher Muneer”, written by Naidu at an early age, fetched a scholarship to study abroad.

Also, Read:

Indian Renaissance The Socio-Cultural Awakening

Indian National Movement

Social Conditions in the Era of Mauryan Imperialism

3
Mauryan Imperialism

The two principal characteristic institutions of the Hindu society (of social polity), namely Verna (caste) and Dharma (stages of religious discipline), secured a definite stage in the era of Mauryan Imperialism (324 BC-AD 320).

According to some Greek writers of importance no one was permitted to marry out of his own caste or to practice any calling or art except his own. For example a soldier could not become an artisan or an artisan a soldier or philosopher. However some writers of the day have claimed that sophists could be free from any caste.

Philosophers, who led their lives in simple style, devoted their existence to serious study and discourses. Some of the philosophers claimed by the Greek authors, became hylobioi (wood-swellers) who lived on leaves and fruits and wore attires made from the bark of trees. This feature resembles very much to the Vanprastha of the Hindu anchorites. Ashoka’s inscriptions also mention householders and ascetics.

Read Also: Centralized Administration of Mauryan Empire

Caste Rules

The influx of foreigners, the rise of heterodox creeds along with many other causes had to an extent affected the rigidity of caste rules. One can come across many instances of matrimonial unions between Indian monarchs and foreign emperors or princess. According to a Satvahena record a king had to take great pain to prevent the mingling of the four castes; the same king was commended as a promoter of the households of Brahmanas and the lowly orders-the Vaisyas  and the Sudras.

According to the Kautilya Arthasastra agriculture, cattle breeding and trade were the common occupation of Vaisyas and Sudras.

According to some of the Greek writers the old difference between the Vaisyas and the Sudras was gradually erased and replaced, with the time, by a new distinction between herdsmen; husbandmen and traders, who formed distinct castes.

The growth of the two official catses, the overseas and the councilors, was a remarkable characteristics of the period; the councilors, undoubtedly, resemble to the amatya (or amacca) or kula described in the Pali texts.

In the days of Megasthenes the population of India was separated into seven castes that consisted of the philosophers, the busbandmen, the herdsmen and the hunters, the traders and the artisans, the soldiers, the overseas and the councilors. The Greek writer ipso facto, described the actual conditions as he witnessed as opposed to the theory of the law-books of the Mauryan Imperialism.

Revival of fourfold division of caste

It was the great Satvahana king, Gautamiputra Satakarni, who earnestly tried to restore the fourfold division of caste (Chaturvahana). He referred to dvijas  (Brahmanas) and  avaras (the lower orders), as object of his special attention. He treated kshatriyas as a conceited class and did much to repress them. It is imperative here to inform that although Satvahanas ruled in the different areas, their rule is  falls in the era of the Mauryan Imperialism.

Although it is not clear why Gautamiputra was so much hostile to the kshtriyas, it seems that the ranks of the kshtriyas were being inflated by Yavanas, Sakas and Pallavas who according to author of Manava-dharmasastra (institutes of Manu) were degraded kshtriyas. It is well recorded in the history, of course by the contemporary writers, that the wrath of the great Satvahana king was particularly directed against the kshtriyas. However, caste rules could not be rigidly enforced during the entire period covering the era of the Mauryan Imperialism. It may appear ironic to some persons but it is a fact that Satvahanas themselves inter-married with Sakas and Brahmanas became generals and king like Drona of old.

Read Also: Timeline of Maurya Empire

Position of Women in Mauryan Imperialism

According to some details provided by Greek writers and contemporary epigraphs, representing the era of the Mauryan Imperialism,  on the position of women ‘some of women pursued philosophy and lived a life of abstinence. However married women were not permitted to share a knowledge of the sacred lore with their husbands.

Polygamy was a common practice among rulers and noblemen. The practice of seclusion of women was prevelant as it is hinted at by the expression like Olodhana occurring in inscriptions.

The wife took a prominent share in religious activities by the side of her husband; it is in the record of the fine-factions of Karuvaki ; the second wife of Asoka himself.

According to the low-giver of the period, ‘Women though deserving of honour should not have independence”. However, history has recorded instances of royal ladies who guided the affairs of a kingdom on behalf of their children.

Manners and Customs

About the manners and customs of the Indian, Greek Latin writers said that Indians lived frugally and observed good order. Cultivators were mild and gentle. Theft occurred very rarely and normally no Indians were accused of lying. The people never took wine except at sacrificial ceremonies and their food was primarily a rice pottage.

Don’t Miss: Memorable events of Indian History