Home Blog Page 360

Sher Shah Suri

16
sher shah suri

Sher Shah Suri: Character and Estimate

It was Sher Shah Suri (also known as Sher Shah Sur) who founded Sur dynasty in Hindustan. This dynasty was founded during the years in which the reign of Humayun was broken and it took Humayun 15 years to re-establish his empire in India.

This interlude of fifteen years of the reign of Humayun is important mainly for two reasons. First, it was the last time that an Afghan Dynasty captured the throne of Delhi and ruled over North India from this capital town. And second, the dynasty reinvigorated and reformed the old administrative system in the country and catered her prosperity, order and peace.

Sher Shah Suri: An Introduction

Sher Shah Suri, originally known as Farid, was a man of humble origin. His grandfather, Ibrahim Sur, was a native of the mountainous region of Roh near Peshawar that is situated at the banks of river Gomal. Ibrahim traded in horses but in his business he could not succeed, so in search of employment he migrated to India during the early years of  Bahlol Lodi’s reign. Ibrahim Sur and his son, Hasan, settled at Bajwara (Hoshiarpur district of Punjab).

It was here (at Bajwara), that Farid was born in 1471 (this date was provided by Bhartendu Harish Chandra and Sayyid Ahmad Khan, both, were renowned writers of 19th century). However, Dr. K.R. Qanungo, a great scholar and an accepted authority on Sher Shah, gives 1486 as Sher Shah’s birth year.

Must Read: The Revenue System under Mughal Administration

Sher Shah Suri: As a Man

Sher Shah, as he was not born in a royal family, had to make his way in life through adversity. Perhaps it is the reason behind the assessment that ‘Sher Shah did not possess the culture and personal charm of a born aristocrat’.

After going through Tarikh-i-Daulat-i-Sher Shahi of Hasan Ali Khan, who was a first rate contemporary Persian authority, one comes to know that Sher Shah in his youth was frivolous and his morals were those of a spoiled young man. He had serious differences with his father who was greatly under influence of Sher Shah’s step mother, so he cannot be described as a dutiful son.

Sher Shah, despite he had a good knowledge of Arabic and Persian and he was fond of history and was well educated, cannot be termed as scholor. He cultivated his study of literature and history for their practical use as for Sher Shah study of them was not an end in itself. He used to read Quran every day, because it was necessary, he believed, for a pious Muhammadan to do so.

Sher Shah can be termed as a patron of learned men in the sense in which other Turk – Afghan Sultans of Delhi were; however, at his court no scholar created any outstanding work of politics, history, economics or even theology, what to say of the sciences. Some modern historians have praised Sher Shah for his patronage of learning without taking pains to find out whether it proved effective in promoting learning and producing work of merit. It is important here to mention that Malik Muhammad Jayasi, a very famous writer who flourished during his time, did not attend his court and was not given any patronage by Sher Shah.

Also Read: The Vedic Age

Sher Shah Suri: His Daily Routine

Sher Shah became king (in 1545), he himself remarked that God had granted him sovereignty in the evening of his life, at the ripe age of sixty eight. However, even at that age he exhibited such kind of physical and intellectual activity that could well be an object of imitation for a youth of twenty-five.

Almost all historians have agreed to the fact that Sher Shah used to spend more than sixteen hours a day to the business of the State. He believed in the motto that “It behoves the great to be always active”. Both Abbas Sarwami and Riaz-Ullah Mustaqi, medieval historians, have written that Sher Shah’ had the habit of getting up after two third of the might had passed. After abulation and prayer he would set himself to attend to the business of State: “For four hours he listened to the reading of reports on affairs of the country or on the condition of government establishments. Orders that he gave were reduced to writing, and were issued and acted upon: there was no need for further discussion. Thus he remained busy till the morning (fajar) arrived “(Waqayat-i-Mustaqi in Elliot).

After morning prayer, it was his routine, he would go for an inspection of the army. Then the time of breakfast came. After breakfast, he held the darbar and there till mid-day he openly executed business of the state. His main work at the Darbar was receiving nobles and vassals and envoys from foreign courts. He also scrutinized the revenue obtained from various parganas and verified the accounts of income and expenditure.

Then at noon he sat down for another prayer and retired for rest. He usually spent his evenings in reading Quran and in the company of learned men unless an important work needed his personal attention. There was hardly any change in his routine whether Sher Shah was at his capital or engaged in military campaign.

Must Read: The Mughal Empire

Sher Shah Suri: His love of Justice

As a ruler the most important feature of Sher Shah’s character was his love of Justice. He famously said, and perhaps used to say, “Justice is the most excellent of religious rites and it is approved alike by the kings of infidels and of the faithful”. He constantly administered even-handed justice as he considered it as his duty to get to the exact truth about the oppressed and the suitors of justice. He never showed any mercy to oppressors even though they might have been his relatives or his nobles.

Sher Shah, following in the footsteps of most of the ancient India’s kings, practiced the liberal policy of helping the poor and the disable. A large amount of money was spent in charity. Sher Shah set a Charity Kitchen’, where whoever came to the court was fed, at the capital on which 500 tolas of gold were expended every day. This charity alone cost the treasury Rs. 18,25,000 per year.

Sher Shah Suri: Place in History

Sher Shah’s devotion to duty, numerous reforms and love of justice have secured for himself a place of eminence in Indian history. No medieval ruler except Akbar the Great had contributed so much for the welfare of the people. Whether assessed as a leader of men or as a builder of institutions or as an administrator or Statesman he stands undoubtedly above his predecessors. His place in history is very high indeed. It is next to Akbar, who as Dr. K.R. Qanungo has observed, “is justly entitled to a higher place in history than Sher Shah”.

Don’t Miss: How East India Company Established British Empire in India? Explained.

The Sufi Movement: Practices of various orders of Sufis in India

4
Sufi movement

Evolved into a well developed movement, the Sufi movement, by the 11th century, Sufism had emerged in the 8th century and the early known Sufis were Rabia-al Adawiya, Al-Junaid and Bayazid Bastami. The followers of Sufism believe, as the fundamental to Sufism is God, Man and the relation between them that is Love, that from man emerged the theories of ruh (soul), qurbat (divine proximity), and hulal (infusion of the divine spirit) and that from relation between God and Man came into being ideas such as Ishq (divine love) and Fana (self-annihilation).

The Sufis were considered as people who kept their heart pure and sought to establish communication with God through their ascetic practices and doctrine of divine love and union with God. The murid (disciple) has to pass through maqamat (various stages) in this process of experiencing communication with divine.

In India, the Sufi Movement commenced in  11th century AD. The oldest Sufi in the sub-continent was Al Hujwiri who established himself in North India and was buried in Lahore. In the history of medieval India are recorded the activities of different Sufi orders of Sufism. The most important Sufi Orders of the period were: Chishtitiya, Suharwardiya, Qadiriya and Naqshbandiya. These ‘Sufi Orders’ were popularly known as ‘Sufi Silsilas’.

Also Read: The Sangam Age : Early History of South India

The principal features of the Sufi Movement, as it emerged in India, are:

  • It was believed by Sufis that for Union with God one needs a spiritual guru or a
  • The Sufi pirs lived in Khanqah (the hospice).
  • The Sufis were organized in a number of ‘Sufi Orders’ (Silsilas).
  • These orders (silsilas), mostly, were led by some important pir or Sufi saint. Generally a silsila was named after the pir and was followed by his disciples.
  • The Khanqahs evolved as important centres of learning that were different from madrasas.
  • In their Khanqahs many Sufi enjoyed the sama (the musical congregation). Qawwali, a musical form, developed during this period.
  • An important form of ritual pilgrimage, the Ziyarat meaning pilgrimage to the tombs of the Sufi saints, developed.
  • Almost all pirs were linked with the miracles as most of the Sufis believed in the performance of miracles.
  • The different Sufi orders (silsilas) had different approaches about the matters of polity and state.

The Chisthi Silsilah

Muinuddin Chisthi, the founder of the Chisthi Silsilah in the chain of the Sufi Movement, came to India after the invasion of  Muizzuddin Muhammad Ghori and subsequently to Ajmer in 1206. He became popular as Khwaja Muinuddin after his death in 1235, his grave was visited by Muhammad Tughlaq. In the fifteenth century it was Mahmud Khalj of Mqalwa who erected the mosque and dome. After the Mughal Emperor Akbar the dargah’s patronage peaked.

It was Qutbuddin Bakhtiyar Kaki who established the presence of the Chisthi Silsilah in Delhi who had come from Transoxiana in 1221 and settled there. By Kaki’s presence the Suharwardis, another order of the Sufi Movement, were threatened and tried to force him to leave by leveling charges against him. However, Iltutmish, the then Sultan of Delhi, dismissed these attempts of Suhrawardis and forced them to relent.

The pirs of the Chisthi Silsilah placed great emphasis on the simplicity of life (life soul of the Sufi Movement), poverty, humility and Selfless devotion to God. According to the pirs of the Chisthi Silsilah, to maintain a spiritual life it is necessary to have control of the senses and this control could only be realized by the renunciation of worldly possessions. Khwaja Muinuddin Chisthi spread the message that the highest form of devotion or God was to rectify the misery of those in distress, fulfilling the requirement of the helpless and to feed the hungry. This Chisthi Silsilah of the Sufi Movement refused to accept any grant for their maintenance from the Sultans.

The best known Chisthi saint of the Sultanate period was Nizamuddin Aulia, who lived in the fourteenth century, the period marked by political change and turmoil. There are numerous stories about the life of Nizamuddin Auliya; famous among them were stories of confrontations between him and the Sultans of Delhi. It is said that the Khwaja Nizamuddin Auliya used to maintain a strict policy of not engaging himself with the group and factions of the Sultan’s Court in Delhi, that earned him respect of many people. Nasiruddin Chiragh Delhi was another famous Chisthi saint of Delhi who played an active role in the political affairs of the period.

In the Deccan the Chisthi Silsilah was established by Shaikh Burhanuddin Gharib in the 13th century. Muhammad Banda Nawaz is among the famous pirs in the region; the Deccan city of Bijapur emerged as an important centre for the Sufi movement.

Must Read: Mughal Architecture

The Suhrawardi Silsilah

As the constituent of the Sufi Movement, the Suhrawardi Silsilah was founded by Shihabuddin Suhrawardi in Baghdad. In India it was established by Bahuddin Zakariya. The Suhrawardi, unlike Chisthis, accepted maintenance grants from the Sultans. They believed that a Sufi should own the three attributes of property, knowledge and hal (mystical enlightenment). Suhrawardi saints took the position that this was necessary to ensure that they served the poor better. They stressed on observance of external forms of religious belief and advocated a fussion of ilm (scholarship) with mysticism.

The practices of the Chisthi Order were rejected by the pirs of Suhrawardi order; these practices involved bowing before time of initiation into silsilah. After the death of Bahuddin Zakariya, the silsialh continued to play an important role in Punjab and Sindh.

Also Read: Classical Dances of India: Mirror of Cultural India

Naqshbandi Silsilah

This Silsilah was established in India by khwaja Bahauddin Naqshband. From the very beginning the mystics of this order emphasized on the observance of Sharint and denounced all innovations or biddat. According to the philosophy of this Silsilah, the relationship between man and God was that of between the slave and the master and not the relation of a lover and beloved. They, in fact, tried to harmonize the doctrines of mysticism and teachings of orthodox Islam.

Also Read: Sikhism – An Introduction to Sikh Religion

The Qadri Silsilah

The Quadiriyya Silsilah was popular in Punjab. The pirs of this Order supported the concept of Wahadat al wajud. Miyan Mir was one of the famous pirs of this silsilah; he had enrolled the Mughal princess Jahanara and her brother Dara as disciples. In the works of the prince the influence of the Sheikh’s teachings is evident.

Shah Badakhshani, another pir of this Silsilah while dismissing orthodox elements, declared that, the infidel who had perceived reality and recognized reality was an infidel.

There was a constant tension between the liberal and orthodox view in Islam during medieval period. However, the Sufis, the flag bearers of Sufi Movement, featured on both sides. On the one side there were those like the Chisthis who held a liberal view and favoured the assimilation of local traditions’ and at the other side there were others like representatives of the Qudiriyya Silsilah who held the view that the purity of Islam was being diluted. This orthodox view was represented by the Ulema that advocated from the perspective of being upholders of the Shariat. The liberal opinion found its voice among many Sufis who were entirely against the narrow definition of Islamic laws by the ulema; and this was the main objective of the Sufi Movement that was a natural response to the growing cult of orthodoxy during the medieval period.

Don’t Miss: Cultural Achievements of Akbar

Invasion of Alexander in India

22

Alexander was the son of Phillip — the King of Macedonia in Greece. He was born in 356 B.C. At the age of 20 he ascended the throne and soon, obsessed by his ambition, he started his conquest of the world. He proceeded towards India after conquering Iran, Afghanistan and Bactrea.

Invasion of Alexander in India

The north western India was divided into small states and the rulers had mutual differences. In 327- 26 B.C., Alexander crossed the Hindukush and entered India. On the frontier states, he established his suzerainty without fighting. In some regions, he had to wage war.

War with Aspasioi Race

First of all, Alexander defeated the Ashwaks or Aspasioi residing in the valley Alisage-Kudar.

Invasion of Nysa

The State of Nysa was governed by the Aristocratic people. The King Akufis accepted the authority of Alexander after being defeated in war.

Read Also: Who were the Mauryas?

Invasion on Massag

This city was situated in the east of the Gori river. Its fort was impreg­nable. After the King Asskenas died, the women of this State fought with Alexander, but ultimately he con­quered them.

Ambhi

He was the ruler of Taxila. He accepted the authority of Alexander instead of fighting with him.

Conquest of Abhisaar

In between the Jhelum and the Chenab, this hilly region and other —-ill states surrendered to Alexander.

War with Porus

Porus was the ruler of the region between Jhelum and Chenab. Alexander had to use maximum energy and intellect to defeat him. Alexander was very much impressed by the bravery of Porus and he befriended him and sought for his help.

Glausai or Glaukanikai

Alexander overcame Glusasi with great difficulty. After crossing Chenab, he subdued the nephew of great Porus. He defeated Adraistai with the help of Porus. He stormed Sangala.

Revolt in Alexander’s Army

After the conquest of Subhuti, as he reached on the banks of Vyas river, his army refused to proceed further. When the army did not listen to his appeal, he decided to go back and while returning he conquered Siboi and the Agalassian, Mallvi and Massanoi.

Alexander’s Return Journey and Death

Alexander started on his return journey in 325 B.C. He divided his army into two parts. One section started return journey via sea-route under Nearchus. The second part under the leadership of Alexander followed the land route. But Alexander could not reach his homeland. He died in Babylon in 32.5 B.C.

Also, Read:

Centralized Administration of Mauryan Empire

History of India in a nutshell

Jawaharlal Nehru

2
Jawaharlal Nehru
Jawaharlal Nehru

Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India and a central figure in Indian politics for much of the 20th century. He emerged as the paramount leader of the Indian independence movement under the tutelage of Mahatma Gandhi and ruled India from its establishment as an independent nation in 1947 until his death in office in 1964. Nehru is considered to be the architect of the modern Indian nation-state: a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic.

The son of Motilal Nehru, a prominent lawyer and one of the Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi’s prominent lieutenants and nationalist statesman, Nehru was a graduate of Trinity College, Cambridge, and the Inner Temple, where he trained to be a barrister. Upon his return to India, he enrolled at the Allahabad High Court and took an interest in national politics, which eventually replaced his legal practice

He became the prominent leader of the left-wing factions of the Indian National Congress during the 1920s, and eventually of the entire Congress, with the tacit approval of his mentor, Gandhi. As Congress President in 1929, Nehru called for complete independence from the British Raj and instigated the Congress’s decisive shift towards the left.

Nehru met Gandhi for the first time in 1916 at the annual meeting of the Indian National Congress (Congress Party) in Lucknow. Gandhi was 20 years his senior. Nehru did not assume a leadership role in Indian politics, however, until his election as Congress president in 1929, when he presided over the historic session at Lahore that proclaimed complete independence as India’s political goal.

The first big national involvement of Nehru came at the onset of the non-co-operation movement in 1920. Nehru was arrested on charges of anti-governmental activities in 1921 and was released a few months later. In the rift that formed within the Congress following the sudden closure of the non-co-operation movement after the Chauri Chaura incident, Nehru remained loyal to Gandhi and did not join the Swaraj Party formed by his father Motilal Nehru and CR Das.

Must Read: Nehru Memorial Museum and Library Resignation of its Director

Nehru was a renowned orator. He could give many extemporaneous speeches in a single day. His most famous speech is the “Tryst with Destiny” address to the Constituent Assembly of India in New Delhi on the night of August 14th and 15th, 1947.

He remained popular with the people of India in spite of political troubles in his final years and failure of leadership during the 1962 Sino-Indian War.

Jawaharlal was the eldest of four children, two of whom were girls. A sister, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, later became the first woman president of the United Nations General Assembly.

Pandit Nehru loved children and they call him affectionately as Chacha Nehru. His birthday is observed as Children’s Day. He believed that children are the future of the nation.

Nehru was a prolific writer in English and wrote a number of books, such as The Discovery of India, Glimpses of World History, and his autobiography, Toward Freedom.

In 1955, Nehru was awarded Bharat Ratna, India’s highest civilian honor.

Also, Read:

Facts about Constituent Assembly

Fundamental Duties Incorporated in Constitution of India

Outbreak of the World War I

1
World-War-1--620x330
World-War-1--620x330

World War I was not a consequence of a single event. Though there were several factors that led to the development of the Great War but above all, it was triggered because of the tensions between the European powers and the crisis of the balance-of-power system which led to the division of Europe into two camps.

While one camp, comprising of Russia, Great Britain, and France, together called as Triple Entente endeavoured to preserve the flimsy balance between great European powers, the second camp of German Empire, Italy, and Austria- Hungry was opposing it.

Read Also: Story of The World War I Explained in 15 Points

Franco-Prussian War

  • The war that was held between the future German empires that is Prussia and France lasted from 1870 to 1871. This war concluded with a humiliating defeat for France. It not only lost its prime regions of Lorraine and Alsace, but it was also forced to pay a huge indemnity to Prussia.
  • This war eventually led to the development of a very powerful German Empire with a tremendous industrial and military potential which was sufficient enough to further disrupt the European power balance on one hand and widespread resentment and desire for revenge of French on the other hand.

Accession of Wilhelm II to the German Throne

  • The German foreign policy became more hostile after the accession of Wilhelm II to the German throne in 1888.
  • Not only this, he also declined the renewal of Reinsurance Treaty with Russia that kept fragile peace between Austria-Hungary and Russia and maintained France in isolation. This way Wilhelm II created an alliance in between Russia and France.
  • The newly formed German Emperor immediately dismissed the skilful Otto Von Bismarck as the Chancellor. Not only this, he also declined the renewal of Reinsurance Treaty with Russia that kept fragile peace between Austria-Hungary and Russia and maintained France in isolation. This way Wilhelm II created an alliance in between Russia and France.

Russo-Japanese War

  • The rivalry between Russo and Japanese over the Korea and Manchuria reached its peak with the resulting Russo-Japanese War in 1904-1905.
  • The war concluded as a major blow for the Russians by the Japanese who lost their entire Pacific and Baltic fleet. This defeat also provoked a very serious political crisis which subsequently led to the Russian Revolution of 1905.

Must Read: Central Powers of World War 1

Moroccan Crisis

  • The Moroccan Crisis had brought the European powers on the verge of war. Germans were the main face behind these crises with the target of creating tensions between the Britain and France alliance. However, it resulted into the opposite.
  • Instead of transforming Britain and getting it close to the Central Powers, these crises further reinforced the Entente Cordiale and resulted into increased hostility of the British towards Germany.

Bosnian Annexation Crisis

  • It was in 1908 that Austria-Hungary planned to annex Herzegovina and Bosnia, which was an integral part of the Ottoman Empire. This annexation was very bitterly opposed by Serbia, which was very closely related to the province both geographically and ethically. Serbia at that time was supported by the Tsarist government and the crisis persisted into 1909.
  • Russia somehow failed to win over a firm support from Britain or France, whereas Vienna enjoyed full support from Germany and accepted the full annexation of the province.
  • Serbia was then forced to back out resulting into the end of the crisis. But these crises permanently damaged the relationships between Russia and Serbia and between Austria-Hungry.

Italo-Turkish War

The Italo-Turkish war that took place between 1911 and 1912 did not disrupt the European peace. But the Turkish defeat exposed the weakness of the Ottoman army and also revealed the disagreement between the European powers about the fate of the decaying Ottoman Empire. The war between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Italy turned out to be an incentive for the Balkan League.

Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

A group of conspirators belonging to Mlada Bosna (the revolutionary movement) carried out the assassination of the Austro-Hungarian heir presumptive, Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife on their visit to Sarajevo on 28th June 1914. This event triggered the subsequent course of events that directly led to the outbreak of the Great World War I.

Don’t Miss:

Timeline of World War I

Know about World War I

World War II Story in a nutshell