As democratic India celebrates ‘Babasaheb’ Ambedkar’s 125th birth anniversary, he stands taller than he ever did before. His role in the struggle for a modern, democratic and socially just India greatly increased at the cost of various other outstanding national personalities, who were contemporary and opponents during the Freedom Movement era. Ambedkar’s legacy is going through a revival as political parties, across India’s ideological canvass, are fighting to use it.
And now when inequality, as a rising concern, is creating turmoil in Western countries, Ambedkar’s appeal has stretched to Western shores as well: ‘the UN is going to celebrate Bhim Rao Babasaheb Ambedkar’s 125th birth anniversary today’. The event is set to showcase the universal appeal of the chief architect of India’s Constitution, who struggled against caste injustice.
The present phenomenon of re-imagination of Ambedkar mirrors as much on his enormous contributions in defining the Indian Republic as it does on the contemporary relevance of the themes; he has become a symbol of equality, social justice and rule of law. However, it has become crystal clear that those who claim to shoulder his legacy have failed.
Must Read: Democracy and Social Transformation: Insights from Ambedkar
Ambedkar and the Caste System
Ambedkar, born Bhimrao on April 14, 1891, at Mhow in Madhya Pradesh in an austere and religious Mahar family, was a crusader against untouchability and Caste system that eventually compelled him to embrace Buddhism in 1956.
By the time he finished his formal studies in early 1920s Ambedkar had attained qualifications that transcended the M.A., Ph.D, M.Sc. (Econ.), D.Sc. (Econ) and Barrister-at-law. By the time he got to the age of 30, he had been through a real-life education that most people do not acquire in a lifetime.
Ambedkar’s four decades of public life began with the brilliant paper he had done on “The caste in India, their Mechanism Genesis and Development” for Alexander Goldenwaiser’s anthropology seminar in New York on May 1916.
Ambedkar believed that caste hierarchies were an intrinsic part of Hinduism. He disagreed with Mahatma Gandhi’s vision of self-governing village as India’s foundation. Instead he viewed them as dense of inequality in the name of caste.
In the current national situation his uncompromising analysis of the caste system, of chaturvarnya and sanatana dharma, of notions of pollution, of rigid or unalterable social hierarchy and of the hegemony of the Shastras must be made a part of national debate.
In “Annihilation of Caste’ Ambedkar imagined the destruction of a religion that continued the fixity of offensive relations in society. In this work he laid stress on the anti-social, anti-progress character of an unjust social order as well as its vital connection with political power that was created through network of force and ideology.
The cast system, in Ambedkar’s opinion and analysis, militated against fraternity. When challenged by the critics to come up with his model of “ideal society” in lieu of a caste- based order, he replied “My ideal would be a society based on liberty, equality and fraternity”. He specified that in his ideal society there would be fraternity, which was only another name for democracy, and democracy was primarily a method of associated living, of linking communicated experience and promoting an attitude of respect and reverence towards fellow human beings.
Ambedkar as a rebel
Ambedkar, as an oppressed intellectual and social rebel had warned, “Chaturvanaya must fail for the very reason for which Plato’s Republic must fail.” He stressed that “the lower classes of Hindus” were “completely disabled for direct action on account of a wretched system”. He emphatically said, “There cannot be a more degrading system of social organization ……… It is the system which deadens, paralyses and cripples people from helpful activity”.
Ambedkar tried to follow through the implication of this system in the political domain. In Ambedakar’s opinion, the real remedy was “to destroy the belief in the sanctity of the Shastras and their caste-borne tyranny.
In this context, it was no wonder that Gandhiji, who was a notable compromiser in such matters, declared more than half a century ago. “Dr. Ambedkar is a challenge to Hinduism”.
Also Read: Ambedkar’s World : The Making of Babasaheb and the Dalit Movement (Eleanor Zelliot)
Ambedkar’s final battle against Social orthodoxy
Ambedkar, one of the leading authors of the Constitution, led the effort to institute a reasonably forward-looking Hindu Code Bill but it was sabotaged by orthodox elements. This battle was the instructive fight over the Hindu Code Bill in the late 1940s, and the early 1950s in which social orthodoxy and opportunist politics joined hands to defeat social progress. The defeal of this forward-looking legislative measure meant the betrayal of Ambedkar’s vision on such critical issues.
On March 18, 1956 at Ramlila Ground, Agra, Ambedkar said with a heavy heart, “The educated people have betrayed me. I was thinking that after education they would serve their society. But I find that a crowd of clerks has gathered around me, who are engaged in filling their belly”.
Ambedkar was a transparent, honest, challenging, and eclectic liberal thinker. He found inspiration from the ideals of the French Revolution and also from the society forward-looking and humanistic elements and values in the Indian culture and civilization over the millennia. He was above all a modern thinker, a practitioner of pragmatic polities. He could not be silenced by any particular ideology or religion. Leaders who are toppling over one another to invoke him/appropriate him would do well to learn from that legacy.
Read More: Memorable events of Indian History
The father of Indian constitution contributed not only on Caste system issue but also in Economics .
His thoughts and thesis on Land reforms , currency , consolidation of economy published even before the independence , eventually some of them helped the Indian economy .
As far as Casteism is concerned , he tried hard for the much needed reforms in Hinduism before 1956 , but unfortunately , the other leaders lacked the vision he had at that time . The biography of Dr.Ambedkar is full of struggle , dedication and hard work . Though , today , some of misguided persons blames him for the ill effects of Reservations in employment and education , but at first we must consider that , he opposed the caste system in Indian society . As we were not ready to leave our caste system at that time , he was left with no option but to introduce the reservations . Besides , he even wanted to provide it for the temporary period and insisted to check the outcomes of the reservations and to improve the reservation policy .
Today , we are celebrating his 125th birth anniversary while enjoying the fruits of democracy and equality . This day shouldn’t be confined to not only the celebration but to grasp his vision for the nation and prosperous society as well .
People of this country know him as a father of reservation rather than great intellectual of economics,politics and sociology.It is a matter of shame for us.Every Indian person as well as politicians should try to understand the vision of Baba Ambedkar and not adopt him as a dalit leader or a person for votes.
People know that Babasaheb is a leader of dalits only but it’s not true.He was a leader of all classes.In fact he was the first man to introduce reservation for females, but unfortunately he was opposed .He was the man who fought against all evils of society.He wanted a society free from bad traditional practices.He is an innovator who tried his best to create a new society based on equality for all
The Greatest ModernBuddhist Leader of India is Babasaheb.
The father of consititution is baba sahab.The peoples of country is follow the consititution.The consititution is reversed to lower castes.The constititution of india for being for lower castes and have reserved in india.The lower caste peoples have working for upper castes peoples.They have touching system.The period of kings is working for upper castes peoples.The consititution have making for right to freedom.
The symbol of knowledge & He is greatest economics in India.and the father of indian constitution I am proud of Dr B R Ambedkar…
”Positively, my social philosophy may be said to be enshrined in three words : Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. Let no one, however, say that I have borrowed my philosophy from the French – Revolution. I have not. My philosophy has roots in religion and not in political science. I have derived them from the teachings of my Master, the Buddha. In his philosophy, liberty and equality had a place ; but he added that unlimited liberty destroyed equality, and absolute equality left no room for liberty. In his philosophy, law had a place only as a safeguard against the breaches of liberty and equality ; but he did not believe that law can be a guarantee for breaches of liberty or equality. He gave the highest place to Fraternity as the only real safeguard against the denial of liberty or equality or Fraternity which was another name for brotherhood or humanity, which was again another name for religion”. ( P. No. 503 , writings and speeches of Dr. Ambedkar vol no. 17 part 3 )….
Please don’t misinterpreted Ambedkar’s ideology…ok
B.r. ambedkar is a true inspiration….
Great Social reformer…..
N provide information about hindu code bill plz
Comments are closed.